No More Taxes, Please.

2008 November 14 at 10:34 pm (Politics) (, , )

If you weren’t planning to go to the Tredyffrin Twp. Supervisors’ meeting on Monday November 17, 2008  at 7:30 p.m. at the township building, this may change your mind.

1.  The township projects a $3 million shortfall for 2009, based on Twp. Manager, Mimi Gleason’s preliminary budget.  The township currently has millions in reserves, and by year-end will have $11 million in its reserves.  

Wait a moment.  They have SURPLUS?  That is, the monetary need was satisfied, and they have left over money.  That was our money, they could have returned it or taxed us less the next year.  Why did they continue collecting excess money year after year?  Aren’t there risks involved with having $11 million sitting in an account somewhere?  

2.  A tax increase of 5% is being considered.  Last year it was increased 3.3%, and this 2009 increase would be the 5th in 11 years. The township has not cut anything from its budget in the last 9 years.  

Nothing cut from their budget in 9 years?  Unbelievable!  Imagine running your household that way, or if your employer running his/her business with no budget cuts.  Your child is potty trained, and you continued to buy diapers.  Your beloved dog died, and you still buy dog food.  Your commute doesn’t require you to buy a monthly SEPTA pass, but you buy one anyway.  The point here is, as times change, so do the needs for our money.  It’s very likely that there are items to cut from the budget.  

Four years ago, our family went through a tough patch.  My husband did not go to his boss, and take money out of his wallet.  Instead, we gutted our budget; we adjusted.  We refinanced our mortgage, changed our telephone/internet subscriber, reevaluated our insurance needs, hung-up the monthly cellphone package, scrapped eating out, skipped summer camps, sunk our summer pool membership, and had a very inexpensive vacation.

The benefit?  When my husband got a new job and a better salary, we didn’t reexpand our budget to previous levels.  Now we give much more to charity, save regularly, and know how to live under-budget.  

It could be same with the Township budget.  Clear away the non-essentials while times are bad, and when the economy improves, they can continue to work off of the smaller budget, or if the taxpayers want, they can add services.  

3.  Non-union staff receive a “Longevity Pay” bonus at the end of the year based on how many years they’ve worked for Tredyffrin.  

 First, paying bonuses from tax money is improper.  As you know, companies usually pay a bonus in profitable years, and the bonus is paid from the surplus generated that year.  The government doesn’t compete with anyone.  Government salaries are paid only by forcibly removing money from us, so the only way they can run a profit is by over-taxation.  
Second, this bonus is paid based on years of bench-warming.  The more years you sit at your desk, the more money you make.  In the real world, bonuses are linked to performance.  
Third, “Longevity Pay” should be called “Yearly Bonus” which clearly indicates that it is not “pay” or “salary,” and that it is paid annually, regardless of merit.  

4.  Non-union staff receive 100% Medical Insurance coverage. 

Wow, sign me up!  100% Is amazing, and way better than the 80% most people receive from their employers.  

Please help us stave off this tax increase by attending this meeting, or by sending a letter to the Board of Supervisors,  Tredyffrin Twp. Building, 1100 Duportail Road, Berwyn, PA  19312-1079, phone (610) 644.1400.

-A Pen in The Woods

2 Comments

  1. Ann Goodman said,

    I have just read your post of Nov. 14th on taxes. Here are my responses to your 4 points.

    1. Yes, it was our money, and it still IS our money. It is our money whether they choose to return it to us or not. And the best thing they could do with our money is to save it for a rainy day (like now), as would any reasonable person in their own financial planning. There are risks with everything, especially being in need of money for a situation and not having it. This happens to governments as it does to people. If the government cannot spend when the private sector stops spending, we are in serious trouble, and it would be failing us on one of its most important responsibilities.

    2. Clear away the essentials when the economy is bad and you are just contributing to the bad economy. That is the opposite of one of government’s important functions. This shows a failure to understand the difference between the private sector and the public sector. In general, the public sector has to do the exact opposite of the private sector to keep the economy from experiencing extremes. Governments should cut their budgets in GOOD times, not bad, if there are non-essentials (which there rarely are!). Actually there are way more things that governments should do than there are that they should cut out.

    3. You do understand that government is not a profit making entity, right? There is no such thing as profit in the public sector.

    You really have a distorted view of government if you really believe your statement on the forceful removal of money. Of course it is “forceful” – and I am glad it is. I want what government provides, and I want everyone (since everyone benefits) to pay their fair share for it. I don’t like it when my sense of responsibility to the larger community costs me but does not cost you.

    4. Most people get better wages than public sector employees do. I think this is a great way to compensate the township staff.

    Another simple point. If our township wants to make some capital improvement or spend money in some other productive way, doing so now may mean it can be done for a better price than later, since such opportunities might mean it can be done at a lower cost given this economy. This is just common sense.

    I think Barak Obama, already one of the best presidents we have ever had, will show us some good examples of how a responsible governments works. Stay tuned!

    • ngzax said,

      Ann Goodman wrote:

      Barak Obama, already one of the best presidents we have ever had

      Earth to Ann: He isn’t President yet.

      You might want to consider toning down your exhuberance. Though I wish him success (only a fool would ever wish his own leaders to fail), the real world sometimes has a way of thwarting even the best intentions.

      You have, however, provided an excellent insight into the mentality of “loyal comrades”. Where would any good autocrat be without them?

Leave a comment